Voice Quality
There are different areas in which the quality of voices can be compared:
-
Intelligibility is a measure of how easy it is to understand what is being spoken by the voice.
-
Accuracy is a measure of how good the voice is at reading an arbitrary document.
-
Naturalness is a measure of how human a voice sounds.
Different aspects of the voice can also be compared:
Phonetic Quality
Phonetic quality is an assessment of the quality of the individual phonemes a voice produces.
-
Phonetic Intelligibility is an assessment of how easy it is to recognize each phoneme spoken by the voice and distinguish between similar phonemes.
-
Phonetic Accuracy is an assessment of how accurate the voice is at reproducing the phonemes.
-
Phonetic Naturalness is an assessment of how human-like the phonemes are, regardless of their intelligibility. This also includes how natural the phonemes sound when combined (i.e. do they flow together naturally).
For example the eSpeak English voice is intelligible (the different phonemes can be easily recognized), is accurate and does not sound natural (it uses a spectral synthesizer which sounds robotic and sibilant fricatives have a white noise component which sounds harsh).
Prosodic Assignment Quality
Prosodic assignment quality is an assessment of the quality of the prosody applied to a given sentence. That is the stresses, pauses, speed and pitch over the course of an arbitrary text.
-
Prosodic Assignment Intelligibility is a measure of how easy it is to understand what is being said, e.g. being able to differentiate between normal sentences, questions and exclamations.
-
Prosodic Assignment Accuracy is a measure of how accurate the voice is at applying prosody to a given text (allowing for subjectivity and natural variance in speech).
-
Prosodic Assignment Naturalness is a measure of how natural the prosody sounds.
For example the eSpeak English voice is intelligible, mostly accurate (for very long sentences it is too fast) and usually sounds natural (for very long sentences it does not take pauses for breath-breaks).
Prosodic Modulation Quality
Prosodic modulation quality is an assessment of the quality of the assigned prosody to the phonemes of the voice. That is, how the phonemes vary in speed and pitch when the prosody is applied to them.
-
Prosodic Modulation Intelligibility is a measure of how easy it is to recognise the phonemes across the different prosodic variations, specifically at the extremes of speed and pitch and from pitch transitions.
-
Prosodic Modulation Accuracy is a measure of how accurate the phoneme modifications are to the given prosody.
-
Prosodic Modulation Naturalness is a measure of how natural the phonemes sound at the different speeds and pitches as well as the changes in pitch.
For example the Cepstral Allison voice is intelligible, is not very accurate (pitch distortion is prevalent in this voice when compared to others) and does not sound very natural (the pitch distortion makes it sound artificial).
Pronunciation Quality
Pronunciation quality is an assessment of the quality of the pronunciation of the language(s) the voice supports.
-
Pronunciation Intelligibility is a measure of how easy it is to recognise the words in the specified language when compared to understanding a native speaker in the supported language.
-
Pronunciation Accuracy is a measure of how accurate the pronunciation of the words is in the specified language and dialect.
This is something that can be assessed in an automated way provided that a suitable test corpus can be produced and the text-to-speech engine can produce the phonemes the voice uses to pronounce the entries in that corpus, which can then be compared against a reference phoneme set.
-
Pronunciation Naturalness is a measure of how natural the pronunciation is. That is, it is measuring the suprasegmental morphology of speech (i.e. how words flow/merge together when spoken).
For example the eSpeak English voice is very intelligible, very accurate and moderately natural.